Vignetting is not an issue with either of these lenses. The 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 has negligible vignetting at any setting, while the Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 only has noticeable vignetting wide open at f/2.8 (and even then, it’s not bad). Stop the 70-200mm down to f/4, and especially f/5.6, and vignetting disappears. 4.
Focal Length Range : 70 -200 mm, Minimum Focus Distance : 3.28 ft. Optimized for capturing high-quality stills and HD videos on both FX- and DX-format cameras. Nikon's high-performance f/4 fixed aperture zoom lens. Weight- Approx-30.0 pounds. 20 elements in 14 groups (including 3 ED lens elements, one HRI lens element and lens elements with
Earlier this year my 80-200 f2.8 broke (well, I broke it by dropping on concrete). Nikon's 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II was too expensive, could not find used VR I in good condition so I ended up buying 70-200 2.8 stabilized sigma. Sigma turned out to be a very nice lens with faster and more accurate autofocus on my D300 and additional benefit of good
F2.8 give an extra stop of light, shallower depth of field wide open, are generally larger, heavier and more expensive. Depends on the lens but a 2.8 stopped down to f4 is usually sharper than a f4 lens wide open. Sharpness, colour rendition, contrasts, distortion, aberrations etc. depends on the lens. 1. Dubdah.
Stopped down to f/5.6, the sharpness on the Nikon 300mm f/2.8 improves and gets very comparable to the 200-400mm. Nikon 300mm f/2.8 + TC-17E II vs Nikon 200-400mm f/4.0 + TC-14E II. Now here is an interesting comparison – if we take the Nikon 300mm f/2.8 and add the TC-17E II, we end up at 510mm.
hMO0sM. c72cnt611b.pages.dev/487c72cnt611b.pages.dev/406c72cnt611b.pages.dev/650c72cnt611b.pages.dev/181c72cnt611b.pages.dev/603c72cnt611b.pages.dev/749c72cnt611b.pages.dev/909c72cnt611b.pages.dev/137c72cnt611b.pages.dev/447c72cnt611b.pages.dev/552c72cnt611b.pages.dev/417c72cnt611b.pages.dev/150c72cnt611b.pages.dev/56c72cnt611b.pages.dev/50c72cnt611b.pages.dev/508
nikon 70 200 f4 vs f2 8
